This is a preview and has not been published.

Legal Awareness and Administrative Sanctions in the Occupational Safety and Health Compliance System

An empirical and Theoretical Examination of the Sanctioning Paradox

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54200/kt.v6i1.110

Keywords:

occupational safety, compliance, legal awareness, administrative sanctions, deterrent effect, prevention

Abstract

This study examines two key elements of occupational safety compliance – legal awareness and administrative sanctions – in the context of the regulatory tightening introduced in 2024. The central question of the research is whether the repressive strengthening of the sanctions system is accompanied by an improvement in compliance indicators. Based on a descriptive-comparative methodology, the study analyses official data from 2023 to 2024. The empirical results reveal a pattern consistent with the concept of a “sanction paradox” introduced in the study: while the total amount of occupational safety fines more than doubled, the proportion of employers and employees involved in violations also increased. The dogmatic analysis highlights that the 2024 fine-imposition reform created a quasi-algorithmic sanctioning structure that narrows the authorities’ discretion, thereby limiting the possibility of individualized and proportionate application of the law. The study suggests that the potential role of legal awareness should not be disregarded when interpreting the effectiveness of the sanctions system. Where legal subjects lack adequate knowledge of their legal obligations, the preventive effect of sanctions may be more limited. Accordingly, this study presents legal awareness as one possible interpretive framework for understanding the observed pattern. This study contributes to the discourse on the effectiveness of administrative sanctions by demonstrating, from both empirical and doctrinal perspectives, that repressive measures alone do not necessarily ensure sustainable compliance with the law.

References

Árva Zs. (2023). A közigazgatási szankcionálás új irányai és a hatékonyság. KözigazgatásTudomány, 3(2), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.54200/kt.v3i2.73

Árva Zs. (2025). A közigazgatási szankció represszív funkciója a globális jogi térben. KözigazgatásTudomány, 5(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.54200/kt.v5i1.95

Ayres, I., & Braithwaite, J. (1992). Responsive Regulation. Transcending the Deregulation Debate. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195070705.001.0001

Baldwin, R., Cave, M., & Lodge, M. (2011). Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy, and Practice. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199576081.001.0001

Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 169–217. https://doi.org/10.1086/259394

Boda Zs. (2015). Intézményi bizalom és a közpolitikák eredményessége. In Boda Zs. (Szerk.), Bizalom és közpolitika (pp. 7–21). MTA TK PTI – Argumentum. Online: http://real.mtak.hu/id/eprint/47591

Bottyán B. (2025). A compliance paradigmája. Pro Publico Bono – Magyar Közigazgatás, 13(2), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.32575/ppb.2025.2.5

Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press.

Dannecker, G. (2022). Compliance: Hazai és nemzetközi “Jó gyakorlatok”. Miskolci Jogi Szemle, 17(5), 196–209. https://doi.org/10.32980/MJSz.2022.5.2198

European Commission. (1996). Guidance on risk assessment at work. Publications Office of the European Union. Online: https://osha.europa.eu/en/legislation/guidelines/guidance-risk-assessment-work

Ewick, P., & Silbey, S. S. (1998). The Common Place of Law. Stories from Everyday Life. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226212708.001.0001

Gajduschek Gy. (2016). Empirikus jogtudat-kutatás Magyarországon 1990 után. MTA Law Working Papers, 2016/11. Online: https://real.mtak.hu/121447/1/2016_11_Gajduschek.pdf

Gray, W. B., & Mendeloff, J. M. (2005). The Declining Effects of Osha Inspections on Manufacturing Injuries, 1979–1998. ILR Review, 58(4), 571–587. https://doi.org/10.1177/001979390505800403

Gunningham, N. A., Thornton, D., & Kagan, R. A. (2005). Motivating Management: Corporate Compliance in Environmental Protection. Law & Policy, 27(2), 289–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.2005.00201.x

H. Szilágyi I. (2017). A jogtudat-kutatások elméleti kérdései. Iustum Aequum Salutare, 13(1), 15–36. Online: https://ias.jak.ppke.hu/20171sz/05_HSzilagyi_IAS_2017_1.pdf

Hammersley, M. (2013). What is qualitative research? Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781849666084

Hutter, B. M. (2011). Managing Food Safety and Hygiene: Governance and Regulation as Risk Management. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857935717

Johnston, M. P. (2014). Secondary Data Analysis: A Method of which the Time Has Come. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 3(3), 619–626. Online: https://www.qqml-journal.net/index.php/qqml/article/view/169

Kovács É. M. (2015). Az együttműködés előmozdítása a magyar közigazgatásban. Az utasítás és ellenőrzés vs. a bizalom szerepe. In Boda Zs. (Szerk.), Bizalom és közpolitika (pp. 163–189). MTA TK PTI – Argumentum. Online: http://real.mtak.hu/id/eprint/47591

Kulcsár K. (1997). Jogszociológia. Kulturtrade Kft.

Lapsánszky A. (2019a). A hatósági döntések. In Patyi A. (Szerk.), A közigazgatási hatósági eljárásjog jogintézményei (pp. 293–334). Dialóg Campus Kiadó. Online: https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/30619189

Lapsánszky A. (2019b). A hatósági ellenőrzés. In Patyi A. (Szerk.), A közigazgatási hatósági eljárásjog jogintézményei (pp. 433–488). Dialóg Campus Kiadó. Online: https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/30619189

Merry, S. E. (1990). Getting Justice and Getting Even. Legal Consciousness Among Working-Class Americans. University of Chicago Press.

Mischke, C., Verbeek, J. H., Job, J., Morata, T. C., Alvesalo-Kuusi, A., Neuvonen, K., Clarke, S., & Pedlow, R. I. (2013). Occupational safety and health enforcement tools for preventing occupational diseases and injuries. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 8, CD010183. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010183.pub2

Nagy M. (2019). A közigazgatás szankciórendszere. In Jakab A., Könczöl M., Menyhárd A., & Sulyok G. (Szerk.), Internetes Jogtudományi Enciklopédia (Közigazgatási jog rovat, rovatszerkesztő: Balázs I.). Online: https://ijoten.hu/szocikk/a-kozigazgatas-szankciorendszere

Nemzetgazdasági Minisztérium. (2024). Jelentés a nemzetgazdaság 2023. évi munkavédelmi helyzetéről. Online: https://mvff.munka.hu/api/file/direct-download-by-fileid/149606

Nemzetgazdasági Minisztérium. (2025). Jelentés a nemzetgazdaság 2024. évi munkavédelmi helyzetéről. Online: https://mvff.munka.hu/api/file/direct-download-by-fileid/150887

Nyerges É. (2016). Az anyagi jogi bírság a közigazgatási szankciórendszerben. Államtudományi Műhelytanulmányok, 2016/11. Online: https://tinyurl.hu/18bC

Parker, C., & Nielsen, V. L. (2011). Explaining Compliance. Business Responses to Regulation. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857938732

Posner, R. A. (1998). Social Norms, Social Meaning, and Economic Analysis of Law: A Comment. The Journal of Legal Studies, 27(3), 553–556. Online: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/jls/vol27/iss3/2

Ruohonen, J. (2022). A review of product safety regulations in the European Union. International Cybersecurity Law Review, 3(2), 345–366. https://doi.org/10.1365/s43439-022-00057-8

Salguero-Caparrós, F., Pardo-Ferreira, M. C., Martínez-Rojas, M., & Rubio-Romero, J. C. (2020). Management of legal compliance in occupational health and safety. A literature review. Safety Science, 121, 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.08.033

Tenreira, L. (2024). Corporate Best Practice from Soft Law to Hard Law: The Case of Corporate Sustainability and Due Diligence Directive (CS3D). International Business Law Journal, 1, 269–284. Online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4882697

Tyler, T. R. (2021). Why people obey the law. Princeton University Press.

Walters, D., Johnstone, R., Bluff, E., Limborg, H. J., & Gensby, U. (2021). Securing compliance: Some lessons for EU strategy on occupational health and safety (ETUI Working Paper 2021.05). European Trade Union Institute (ETUI). Online: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/299693/1/WP-2021-05.pdf

Weil, D. (2001). Assessing OSHA Performance: New Evidence from the Construction Industry. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20(4), 651–674. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.1022

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications. Sage.

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Legal Awareness and Administrative Sanctions in the Occupational Safety and Health Compliance System: An empirical and Theoretical Examination of the Sanctioning Paradox. (n.d.). KözigazgatásTudomány (AdministrativeScience). https://doi.org/10.54200/kt.v6i1.110