Evolution of the relationship between public administration and the client in brief
Emergence and evolution of customer rights in domestic public administration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54200/kt.v3i2.70Keywords:
client rights, citizens’ rights, principles, right to fair administrationAbstract
In this article I will attempt to give a brief overview of the relationship between administration and the client. With the emergence of communities, there naturally appeared a range of issues that affected the whole of society and whose effective resolution was felt to be the responsibility of all. The initial hierarchical systems, concentrated in a single hand, were able to achieve relatively spectacular results, which were relaxed in early feudalism, with the emergence of individual small (mainly feudal) communities and the disintegration of large empires. The early, more disorganised forms of administration were replaced by a more organised bureaucratic system based on a division of labour based on expertise, with the emergence of monarchies in the 18th century. In the continental legal order, the emergence of chamber law, administrative law as a separate branch of law, and while Anglo-Saxons’ system, the development of a patronage system, the world wars everywhere showed that effective management can only be achieved through an administration based on organisation and performance. The theories underpinning these efforts, in the domestic administration, typically received or followed, did not emerge until the 20th century, although the Prussian organisation of the state could have been typical from the 16th century. The changes in administrative systems have also naturally shaped the status of the subjects - from subject to citizen, and then to citizen, at the mercy of laissez faire economic policies, to equal client of the service administration.
References
Aucoin, P. (1990). Administrative reform in public management: Paradigms, principles, paradoxes and pendulums. Governance, 3(2), 115-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.1990.tb00111.x
Balla A. (2004). A liberalizmus eredete és fogalma. Politikatudományi Szemle, 13(3), 271–282. Online: https://poltudszemle.hu/articles/a-liberalizmus-eredete-es-fogalma/
Bibó I. (1994). A jó közigazgatásról, válogatott tanulmányok. Magvető.
Bodin, J. (1987). Az államról. Gondolat.
Boehme-Neßler, V. (2020). Digitising Democracy: On Reinventing Democracy in the Digital Era - A Legal, Political and Psychological Perspective. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34556-3
Caldwell, P. (1994). Ernst Forsthoff and the legacy of radical conservative state theory in the Federal Republic of Germany. History of Political Thought, 15(4), 615–641. Online: http://www.jstor.org/stable/26215850
Castellani, L. (2017). The Citizen’s Charter: towards consumer service in central government. History&Policy. Online: https://tinyurl.com/2be8vevz
Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2000). The new public service: Serving rather thansteering. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 549–559. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00117
Dunleavy, P., Margetss, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2005). New public management is dead – long live digital era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467–494. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui057
Ferlie, E., Ashburner, L., Fitzgerald, L., & Pettigrew, (1996). The New Public Management in Action. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198289029.001.0001
Gladden, E. N. (2019). A History of Public Administration: Volume II: From the Eleventh Century to the Present Day. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429423215
Hood, C. (1991). A Public management for all seasons?. Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
Kilényi G. (Szerk.). (2008). A közigazgatási jog nagy kézikönyve. CompLex.
Koi Gy. (2015). A francia közigazgatási jogtudomány jellegzetességei (1705–1945). Polgári Szemle; 11(4-6) 240–257. Online: https://tinyurl.com/yjrr5tb7
Laegreid, P. (1994). Going against the cultural grain: Norway. In C. Hood, & B. G. Peters (Eds.), Rewards at the top: A Comparative Study of High Public Office (pp. 133–145). Sage.
Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-624X(01)00066-1
Lőrincz L. (1999). Közigazgatás: Tegnap, ma, holnap. Tér és Társadalom, 13(3), 3–18.
Major, J. (1999). The Autobiography. Phoenix Books.
Maus, I. (1986). Rechtstheorie und politische Theorie im Industriekapitalismus. Fink
Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Harvard University Press.
Osborne, D. T., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spiritis transforming the public sector. Addison-Wesley.
Patyi A. (Szerk.) (2007). Közigazgatási jog II. Közigazgatási hatósági eljárásjog. Dialóg Campus.
Patyi A., & Köblös A. (2016). A közigazgatási bíráskodás alkotmányos alapjai. Pro Publico Bono – Magyar Közigazgatás, 4(3), 8–29. Online: https://folyoirat.ludovika.hu/index.php/ppbmk/article/view/1940
Patyi A. (2019). Gondolatok a Nemzeti hitvallás értelmezéséről. In Patyi A. (Szerk.), Rendhagyó kommentár egy rendhagyó preambulumról, Magyarország Alaptörvénye, Nemzeti Hitvallás (pp. 9–13). Dialog Campus. Online: https://tinyurl.com/3chaxv7u
Patyi A., & Varga Zs. A. (2019). A közigazgatási eljárásjog alapjai és alapelvei. Dialóg Campus. Online: https://tinyurl.com/bdnzfnzj
Paulovics A. (2020). Az eljárási kódex átfogó módosítása: az 1981. évi I. törvény. Miskolci Jogi Szemle, 15(1. különszám), 222–230. Online: https://ojs.uni-miskolc.hu/index.php/jogiszemle/issue/view/47
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis (3d ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(00)00083-2
Simon, H. A., Dantzig, G. B., Hogarth, R., Plott, C. R., Raiffa, H., Schelling, T. C., Shepsle, K. A., Thaler R., Tversky, A., & Winter, S. (1987). Decision Making and Problem Solving. Interfaces, 17(5), 11–31. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.17.5.11
von Stein, L. (1865). Die Verwaltungslehre. Cotta.
Stumpf I. (2008). A „szuperkapitalizmus” válsága, avagy erős állam és társadalmi kiegyezés. Közigazgatási szemle, 2(3–4), 16–23.
Váczi P. (2014). A jó közigazgatási eljárás és alapelvei. In. Kaiser T. (Szerk.), Hatékony Közszolgálat és jó közigazgatás – Nemzetközi és európai dimenziók (pp. 129–152). Nemzeti Közszolgálati Egyetem. Online: https://tinyurl.com/yvwpujuh
Varga Zs. A. (2022). A tisztességes eljáráshoz való jog bírósági aspektusból. Kúriai Döntések Bírósági Határozatok, 70(4), 610–617. Online: https://tinyurl.com/2ah7pdu7
Veszprémi B. (2021). A közigazgatási aktus. In Jakab A., Könczöl M., Menyhárd A., & Sulyok G. (Szerk.), Internetes Jogtudományi Enciklopédia. Online: http://ijoten.hu/szocikk/a-kozigazgatasi-aktus
Weber, M. (1987). Gazdaság és társadalom I. Közgazdasági és Jogi Könyvkiadó
Wittfogel, K. A. (1957). Oriental Despotism: A Comparative Study of Total Power. Yale University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ferenc Varga

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.